Crowner Royal

Customer Reviews

70 Ratings

Overall Ratings

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
  • 4 Stars
  • 3 Stars
  • 2 Stars
  • 1 Stars

Sorted By Most Useful

3 out of 5 stars
By Rogayah on 22-01-2010

12th C. England

This was interesting in that it shows the job of the coroner in this period of English history as well as giving a vivid description of London and the Court at Westminster; all powerful characters in this story. Sir John's trials and tribulations to bring his inquiry to a (successful) end, given a time constraint, is skillfully woven into this well-researched historical novel.

Bernard Knight has yet to put a foot wrong, that together with an intelligent narrator makes this an enjoyable story to listen to.

Read More Hide me

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

3 out of 5 stars
By catsatcastle on 16-03-2015

A pleasant listen

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

It passed the time pleasantly but my test is whether I will want to listen to it again and I doubt I will. I did like the setting and it was good to hear details about the early courts. I could however have done without the detailed menu for each meal the Crowner took along the way.

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

The problem for me was with the central character, the Crowner himself. He is a charmless man, not very bright and ineffective as a coroner, something he feels himself if truth be told.

He would get nowhere without his clerk who pops up every now and then with a vital clue that he has discovered for himself or a flash of insight of which the coroner is himself incapable. I would almost have preferred the story to be about him as he was the one with the investigative mind.

It seems this is the thirteenth title in a series and the first in which the Crowner has been moved to Westminster at the King's request. That move may account for the fact that he is out of his depth. There is some doubt about the extent of his remit which is the excuse for some confrontations with the city merchants but by and large he just seems to go his own way.

I could also have done without the complications of his love life. I suppose in a long-running series about one man there has to be some back story but it took up too much space for me as I have not invested in his character coming to the series so late. He is not interesting enough for me as a central character to make me care one way or the other how things go for him.

Which character – as performed by Paul Matthews – was your favourite?

I rather liked the priest clerk. Paul Matthews also conveyed the women well.

Read More Hide me

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

5 out of 5 stars
By Kenneth on 20-03-2010

More Brilliance

I just can't get enough of Crowner John. Bernard Knight paired with a briliant narrator keeps you enthralled from start to finish.
He paints such a vivid picture of the period I feel that I've been there alongside him.

Read More Hide me

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

2 out of 5 stars
By Nigel on 24-01-2012


Very slow with little action and virtually no suspence. If you're interested in constant references and descriptions of medievil London you may enjoy.

Read More Hide me
Page 1 of 1